“Latino in America” was screened in an auditorium located at the lower level of the Newseum, the DC interactive museum for the news and journalism. When I walked in, the host was speaking and soon after the screening started. I asked for permission to video record the event, but after trying with three different people I was told that video recording wasn’t allowed inside the premises. I had a seat, but later on I had to get up and stand in the back so I could have a better view.
The documentary starts showing a group of people of different races and origins introducing themselves by name and occupation. Most of them were Brown and Black peoples, Indigenous and Afro descendants not Latinos. It's obvious that the producers wanted to show our different shapes and colors, but at the end a woman says “…and I’m a Latina" although she looked Native American to me.
The strong reference to the Spanish surnames in the film as a sign of our heritage is a mistake, and the surname Garcia is mentioned as one of the top most popular surnames in the U.S. According to this concept, our history as peoples started when the Hispanics arrived and imposed their names to our ancestors. Nothing is said about the thousands of years of earlier civilizations, from where most of our cultures come from.
If you get darker you will look like an Indian
The presentation continued and they showed the story of attorney Lorena Garcia, a civil rights advocate for immigrants in Arizona. She is presented mostly in a positive way–the only person who makes reference to her heritage as being “indigenous to this land”- but at the end she is presented as a radical apologetic woman, the bad apple you shouldn't follow.
During the whole film most of the characters are in fact Indigenous peoples from Mexico and other countries of Central and South America, but they are presented as Latinos. Eventually the term switches to Hispanics. During the 45 minutes screening, there was not a single mention in reference to our African and Native roots, not even once.
At some point a couple walked in the auditorium and passed by me, a woman asked me if I was ‘Carlos in DC’ and she said she follows my blog. I was a bit embarrassed, it happens when people recognize me in public places.
This film basically presented “Latinos” in many stories -some sad but real- and the message I got was that we as people are trying to be accepted by White mainstream America. In that sense, we are willing to accept the labels White people put on our communities, because is the easier thing to do.
As the film continues I am disgusted to see the humiliation of many Native men imprisoned by the racist Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Our brothers are treated like slaves. At this point Soledad O’Brien does a good job exposing that reality while the film presents Arpaio as a heartless old man, which he is.
Black Hispanic or Dominican perhaps African American
The film allows viewers to take a close look to the differences, contrasts and inequalities that are common among so called “Latinos”. For instance, the new comers tend to segregate themselves in their own groups, speaking mostly in Spanish -to the delight of religious and corporation groups focusing in that market- and here a Native woman mentions having "a Hispanic face". Horror.
The opposite happens in the town of Pico Rivera, next to Los Angeles and which is populated mostly by Native Americans of Mexican heritage, who have assimilated to the “American way” of living: English speaking, baseball games, sugar cotton candy, hot dogs, cute suburban homes with U.S. flags in their porches, looks alright. But these images make the American dream seem like an effort to imitate White people, and the only different thing about Pico Rivera are the surnames. The documentary doesn’t mention that Pico Rivera population were forced to assimilate, and they had no choice. If this is good or bad, that’s another topic.
There are plenty of sad stories in this film: you will see abused undocumented Native and Afro descendant children –the horrendous images made me really angry- and also our Native men as inmates being chained down by Arpaio. In another scene, a female gang member talks about her failed young life while showing her tattoo in her behind -the film shows this for too long. At some point Lupe Ontiveros, a Native actor of Mexican roots talks about her identity, while wearing an ugly yellowish blond wig. The film moves on to show how a White girl can’t say “carne asada” to which the auditorium explodes in laughter, that I think is wrong.
The only personal successful stories refer firstly to Mel Martinez, the former U.S. Senator (R-FL) whom I like the least, he talks about his migration as a Cuban exile. Had he being Mexican and undocumented, probably he wouldn't have become a Senator. Secondly, they show the case of chef Lorena Garcia who works for Univision TV, one of the most racist stations in this country. How wrong is CNN to use Univision as a cultural reference? Anyways, chef Garcia -who tries hard to look White- talks about her growing business thanks to her image as a “Latina chef”. She said her accent used to be a reason for rejection, but now “it’s popular and seeing as cute”. Of course as long as you try to look like them.
Trying to pass as Whites
Throughout the film Soledad O’Brien plays a neutral but “Latino” friendly role at least in most of the production, eventually she appeared again on screen to say “you will see more when Latino in America airs in October…” and then the film is over. At the end some people walked out, the audience clapped but not too enthusiastically.
In general, the production seemed interesting, but the chore of its script is manipulated, fake, imposing and personally it makes me feel sorry for my peoples, not proud as I had hoped. The film is supposed to help overcome racist stereotypes but it promotes them, especially when they deny our true racial heritage. It seems that CNN is trying to get its viewers to feel sympathy for “Latinos” and to show the country how profitable our markets can be.
I was approached by a museum staff who confirmed again, that video recording wasn’t allowed, but she allowed me to walk to walk up the third row of seats, while the panelists was being introduced. After their words, I raised my hand but two people were given the chance to speak first, bth of them mentioned the need for CNN to fire Lou Dobbs. That was received by a loud applause from the audience.
When I started to speak, I said: My name is Carlos Quiroz, I am a writer and a blogger based in DC. I’m not Latino, I’m not Hispanic, I’m a Spanish speaking Native American.” Whispers followed, some clapped. I spoke from my heart and thinking about those peoples misrepresented in the film: Indigenous and African American peoples forced into European identities.
While speaking I denounced white supremacy and racism among our communities –which forces Black women to hide their African hair and Native women to die their hair blond-, and I mentioned why most of us are and should be acknowledge as Native Americans even if we have Spanish surnames, because our history started before the Hispanics arrived.
Also I mentioned that Blacks in the Americas are an important population to be ignored –almost 18% of the Americas including Haiti- and this documentary failed to mention any of that. Not surprising after all, I said, since this is a production coming from a White-owned TV station, obsessed with catching with the money and political capital behind the fake Latino branding and classification.
Afrolatino Americans
At the end of my intervention, I reminded the Latino in America producers that as people we don’t need no pity, but to raise the awareness of our true heritages because we belong to this continent. Therefore we must tell the truth about who we are -because we don’t know who we are- to our youth as our history is hidden by an Eurocentric vision of the world.
The future of this country will be shaped with diversity and racial coexistence, and to get there we must respect everyone’s heritages and stop imposing divisions among people. I’m done. Applause, it felt good.
The event's host replied to me directly with excuses but no answers, and at that point I knew what was going to be said by the panelists. I walked out because I knew what they were about to tell me, but also because I wanted to interview attendees outside of the building. As I was leaving the museum, I grabbed a bag with a shirt that says "Soy Latino en EEUU".
I waited outside the Newseum with my camera ready, it was raining a bit. People started coming out, they approached me and we talked.
.

Good job! More people need to hear perspectives like yours.
ReplyDeletePilamaya Carlitos! Los viejos nos podemos morir tranquilos sabiendo que el futuro de nuestra gente tiene lideres como tu! Que la Pachamama, los Apus y el Gran Espiritu siempre te protejan y te bendigan! Con todo cari~o y agradecimiento!
ReplyDeleteThank you Rodrigo.
ReplyDeleteElsa, everyone can do something to educate each other and our communities, starting in our families, friends, it's something that we carry from generation to generation, thank you for your kind word. Jailli Pachamama.
Hola Carlos, I second the comments above. I think you're doing a great job as well.
ReplyDeleteI have a question for you. You object to the use of the word Latin or Latino but not American. The word American is derived from the cartographer Americus Vespucious. He wasn't a Native or Black... he was a White Italian. Why does your objection not filter into the word "American" as well? Feel free to reply to me at chomby19@hotmail.com
Anonymous, I use the terms Native American for these reasons mainly:
ReplyDelete1- We are Native to this continent, we are the Indigenous peoples of this land.
2- There are many terms to celebrate our roots: Native, Indian, Indigenous, First Nations, Originarios, Indigenas, Nativos, Cobrizos, etc. and we have to give a land reference to our roots, since there are Native peoples to Asia, Africa, Polynesia, Europe, etc. In our case our land is America, which doesn't mean Europe like the words Latino and Hispanic.
3- We call this continent America for now, it's the name Europeans gave to our ancestors' land. In order to be understood worldwide we have to use it. Our peoples call this continent Abya Yala, after a Kuna word -the people of today's Panama.
We are in fact the Native peoples of the Abya Yala, or America.
I appreciate you posted these videos, they talk bout issues that we never learn in school but are really important for our communities: we need to remember who are our true ancestors, the indigenous peoples of this continent.
ReplyDeleteAll racism is so sad, but pride in being who you are is your right. When it comes to the U.S. and Mexico, the 160 years of de facto apartheid foisted on Mexico by the white supremacist govt. of the U.S. needs to be finally ended by accepting the existence of Mexicans in a bigger 60-state U.S. sans the corrupt Mexican federal govt. that keeps the indigenous people down, allowing Mexico to finally developed as a sector of the U.S. while all indigenous peoples can keep their subcultures and lifestyles as U.S. citizens. Learn about the nonpartisan Megamerge Dissolution Solution by clicking http://go.to/megamerge
ReplyDeleteGreat Job Carlos. Finally someone who gets to the bottom of cracking the myths of these false identities.
ReplyDeleteFirst I just want to say thanks Carlos for you work and devotion to debunking the "latino" myth. I thought I was the only one so it's good to find like minded people.
ReplyDeleteSecondly the "Latino in America" documentary by CNN was disappointing and I'm not surprised. I will wait until I have seen the second half to make a complete judgment, but they have ignored the real issue and that is how the "latino" creation has caused great confusion among indigenous and afro descended people. As an Afro descended "latino" I was ashamed to see an Afro-"Latino" family not address their real roots instead of trying to educate their black children on their "hispanic" heritage.
We need to end this denial of our true identity. We think adopting a "latino" identity will free us from the discrimination our indigenous and black brothers and sisters face on it daily basis, but it doesn't. The true Hispanics (whites) are the only Hispanics who benefit from such identity. We added to their numbers to give them bigger political economic power when we need to return and reclaim our respective groups (black and brown).
I would think someone like Soledad O'brien, an Afro descended Cuban would have some sense to inject this type of discourse into her documentary. But I was wrong.
I really enjoyed watching these perspective on youtube. I was actually impressed by many of the responses. I tend to think that us Latinos forget about our race and hide behind this term. I use Latina as a way to emphasize that I am a person of mixed race. I get so mad when I see Latino/Hispanic as a racial category on any form. I often wonder how to get our people to realize this and be proud of thier ethnicity, race, culture, and nationality...and be aware of all these components when they use to identify as 'Latina' or 'Hispanic'...
ReplyDeleteBravo Carlos!! I should have just read your blog and watched your videos than waste 4 hours watching "Latino in America."
ReplyDeleteHi Carlos, even though I mostly agree with you almost in every word that what was said, I know you're a bit upset that everyone, including the indigenous and Africans were shown as a Latino, Just as you don't like them to ignore their indian/african side, I don't like it either if the Spanish (white european) is ignored either. That is why as you said that we all must respect our heritages. The reason why we are all called Latinos is because
ReplyDelete1) We are born in Latin America regardless of race background.
2) the term Latino can also be used because we all have a bit of the Spanish European side whether you may like it or not.
Just because a person looks 100% indigenous or black or mixed does not mean that genetically they cannot have European genes of Spain. You can call yourself Latino as well because you were born in Latin America regardless of your indigenous background.
linkintek06
ReplyDeleteThe majority of of indigenous and African Americans have European blood especially English but you don't seem them calling themselves "Anglos".
I find it shameful that a "latino" of visible African ancestry can call African Americans "black" distancing themselves from them. We all share the same history of enslavement. As a Afro-Dominican I was ashamed of these two young ladies. Seriously you can't name one Afro-Latino?
African American is applied to anyone born in the Americas of African descent. Just because I speak Spanish that does not make me different from my brothers from the U.S.!
Awesome job Carlos! I stumbled on your blog by accident researching reaction to CNN"s latino in america.
ReplyDeleteAs south american of european decent I agree with almost everything you say. But I strongly believe we need to re-educate everyone on what latino means. It is not a race, it is not an ethnicity. You can be of any race or religion. White, native, mestizo, mulatto, black, asian, jew or muslim.. It is just a US label for anyone from countries that were former colonies of latin europe.
Latino should not be used to describe race! it is only a linguistic category.
Also, sadly many spanish speaking blacks, mulattos, native americans and mestizos are ashamed of their racial background so they hide under the latino label as step up the racial hierarchy towards white.